Dutch Design ’90s
Hard Werken, Jan van Toorn, Wild Plakken, Anthon Beeke

Net/trust
Alexei Shulgin: Refresh (1996)
http://redsun.cs.msu.su/wwwart/refresh.htm
http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9610/msg00000.html

De Geuzen
A foundation for multi-visual research
http://www.geuzen.org/current/DIY/accessories/research.html
http://www.geuzen.org/female_icons/?p=584

Piet Zwart Institute
Media Design = Networked Media?
http://pzwart.wdka.nl/media-design/ (off line!)
http://pzwart.wdka.nl/networked-media

Constant
http://constantvzw.org
Digitales 2003 @ Interface3
http://constantvzw.org/bending/Technobiographies/Track%206.wav

Angry Women (Annie Abrahams, 2011)
http://vimeo.com/33492100

“It really didn’t make any sense to cut into them, that would take away a very essential part: the process of dealing with this situation of No Exit, of voluntarily being trapped in a grid with 7 other ladies that one hardly knew. In the beginning I had difficulties accepting these videoarchives because I saw how much they depended on our hazardous trying to interact, to be present in this universe of alone togetherness. Besides I didn’t like my own presence. As in other webperformances I felt trapped and revealed myself not as I would have liked to be revealed. But now I begin to accept this (again) as its qualities and I do like the very different dynamics in the two versions. These performances raise many questions as for instance possible language and cultural differences, that I would like to explore further but for now I would first like to organise an Angry Men performance and I will try to improve the performance interface.” Annie Abrahams email 3/01/2012.

OSP
Open Source Designers meet Open Source Developers (since 2006)
http://osp.constantvzw.org/foundry/
http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2013/
http://lgru.net

Git/SVN
Beautiful meritocracy: Code Swarm (Michael Ogawa, 2006)
http://vimeo.com/1093745
http://git.constantvzw.org vs http://ospwork.constantvzw.org

Who’s who
For Vlaams Theater instituut, with Michael Murtaugh
What counts as a relationship?
http://whoswho.vti.be/

the dinner table

in preparation of the course “the networked social”, femke, nicolas and i, decided to start the first day with reflecting on why we want to offer this course at erg and what we would like to share with everyone during the course. for that, maybe it is nice to know where each of us are coming from in terms of the things we want to inquire during the course.

i am seda and i have been living in brussels for the last five years. for many years i have been actively involved in many community projects and also like to organize my life around these communities. these can be friends with whom we do things, communities that are based in the neighborhood i live in, colleagues i work with in or outside of institutions, or sometimes a surprising constellation of people who somehow decide to come together and do something. i also like to see people from different communities come together in different ways, be it around a dinner table or in a meeting room. part of my interest for the networked social hence from this community perspective: how do we as members of these communities take up the digital networks of our times (or resist them) and how do the digital networks of our times accommodate and shape  our communities. Maybe, in other words, how do we negotiate space in the networked social?

i am also a researcher with a background in computer science (among other things). i currently work at the ku leuven. we mainly work on research projects on questions about hardware and software design, security, and privacy. currently one of the main projects that we work on is about online social networks and privacy. in this project, we do elaborate on why online social networks are designed the way they are, what consequences this has for the different communities that are involved and how we could design these systems otherwise, given the interests of these different communities.

finally, throughout the last years, i have had the pleasure of working with people who ask critical questions about technology design and computer science. i have been especially intrigued by feminist critiques of computer science within which both the neutrality of systems and the power position of that scientists and engineers have with respect to designing the systems that we use. i have also been very interested in participatory design and how the free and open source software philosophies can play a role in developing such practices. i have also had the great joy of working both with designers and artists who ask similar questions from their point of practice.

so, all of these experiences and questions brought me to the “networked social”. during the course i will especially focus on algorithms, web tracking and the design of privacy technologies. i especially hope to reflect on topics like what makes an algorithm? what makes an algorithm a “good” algorithm? what is web tracking? what could it have been? what can it become? and finally, i would like to take some time to ask what it means to negotiate the public and the private? how do we do this individually but also in our communities? what is the role that networked digital technologies plays in these negotiations? how can we negotiate what these technologies are or can be?

i look forward to teaching together with femke and nicolas starting tomorrow and i look forward to meeting all the ergians!